Loading…
The Library Publishing Forum is an annual conference bringing together representatives from libraries engaged in (or considering) publishing initiatives to define and address major questions and challenges; to identify and document collaborative opportunities; and to strengthen and promote this community of practice.

For the first time in 2020, we are holding the Forum virtually. We are excited to be able to share Forum programming with the library publishing community at a time when travel and large gatherings are impossible, while extending our ongoing thanks to the University of Massachusetts Medical School for their work as the host of our planned in-person conference.

#LPForum20
May 4-8 | noon to 5 PM Eastern Time


Monday, May 4
 

12:00pm EDT

Keynote: OASPA and open access: Guiding a diverse community to a shared end goal
In this presentation Claire will give an overview of OASPA and its aims and membership, take a look at global trends in open access and how open access publishing fits into the bigger picture, and reflect on recent changes in scholarly communication in response to the current pandemic.

Speakers
avatar for Claire Redhead

Claire Redhead

Executive Director, OASPA
Claire Redhead is Executive Director of OASPA - a diverse, open access publishing community. Claire was a contributor to the in-depth study of Diamond OA Journals and is an active member of a number of working groups and committees, including Think. Check. Submit., the OA Books ... Read More →


Monday May 4, 2020 12:00pm - 1:00pm EDT
Zoom1

1:00pm EDT

Break
Monday May 4, 2020 1:00pm - 1:15pm EDT
TBA

1:15pm EDT

Discovering Best Practices Through Research and Assessment: Documenting labour in Canadian, independent scholarly journal publishing: Phase 1 results and discussion
Conversations around scholarly publishing often focus on the cost of the publications for authors and readers but overlook questions about the labour that goes into creating these publications. Who is doing this work? How are journal staff and editorial boards compensated? What is the labour structure of these publications? These are important questions for understanding the scholarly communications landscape and obtaining a holistic vision of its future.

As of 2019, there are over 1,000 active independent scholarly journal publishing in Canada. Anecdotally, we observe that many of them are small teams with overextended labour or as one author fears these are journals that “ limp along, with estimable doggedness, but are often one devoted editor away from the digital graveyard” (Pooley, 2019). From our positions working within library publishing and as journal editorial team members ourselves, we were surprised to find that there was no systematic documentation of this labour.

This presentation will introduce a new research project that seeks to understand who undertakes the labour in independent Canadian academic journal publishing and go over initial results from the first phase of data collection. We will include the study’s motivations, research question, and methodology and a brief review of current literature. The presentation will also include a preliminary analysis of the data, that will include types of editorial positions titles as well as the size of editorial teams.

At the end of the presentation, we will present our next steps and invite feedback from the audience on the study’s design and methodology on how they could use this information to better support the independent journals at their institution.

References

Pooley, J. (2019, September 3). The library solution: How academic libraries could end the APC scourge. Retrieved from https://items.ssrc.org/parameters/the-library-solution-how-academic-libraries-could-end-the-apc-scourge/

Slides can be downloaded at https://escholarship.mcgill.ca/concern/presentations/7w62fd646?locale=en

Speakers
avatar for Jessica Lange

Jessica Lange

Coordinator, Scholarly Communications, McGill University
avatar for Sarah Severson

Sarah Severson

Digitization Librarian, University of Alberta


Monday May 4, 2020 1:15pm - 2:15pm EDT
Zoom2

1:15pm EDT

Discovering Best Practices Through Research and Assessment: How are we doing? Annual survey of University of Florida journal publishing program serves to educate and assess DEI practices
Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) is a strategic direction of importance to the University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries throughout library services and activities. In 2019, the journal publishing team at the UF Libraries retooled its annual survey of publishing partners to explore the current status and understanding of DEI in scholarly publishing. The survey instrument served not only to assess current practice, but also to inform and educate responders on DEI practices. In the survey, DEI was broadly defined to include composition of contributors (authors, reviewers, editors) as well as content and format of published material. Questions in the survey included multiple choice, ranking, and open-ended responses for current and anticipated practices. A selection of questions were repeated from the 2018 survey to review trends over time. Results from both years indicate satisfaction with the ability to find the journal online (discoverability), journal usage, and archiving as well as the quality and promptness of the service team. Open-ended comments enabled nuanced responses, important for questions such as “In your opinion, what can editors and publishers do to reduce barriers faced by under-represented or marginalized scholars in academic publishing?” Survey results are shared with participants, while respecting privacy, and inform publishing program development. The survey introduced a number of DEI practices and considerations for journal publishers. Related topics were featured during the Libraries’ Publishers Round Table series before and after the survey was distributed. This annual assessment tool impacts the journal publishing program policies and educational programs, and guides development of future services.

Speakers
avatar for Suzanne Stapleton

Suzanne Stapleton

Associate Librarian, University of Florida
As an Agricultural Sciences and Digital Scholarship Librarian, Suzanne offers expertise in agricultural literature searches, open access publishing, and digitization of historic print materials. She has co-facilitated and participated in previous CoLABs and is excited to share this... Read More →
avatar for Chelsea Johnston

Chelsea Johnston

Scholarly Publishing & Repository Librarian, University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries


Monday May 4, 2020 1:15pm - 2:15pm EDT
Zoom2

1:15pm EDT

Discovering Best Practices Through Research and Assessment: What is the Future of APCs? The Case at Dartmouth
Many libraries, including Dartmouth, encourage open access by helping faculty pay for their article processing charges (APCs). The Dartmouth program started around 2011, and regulations (eg. no hybrid journals), the demand for APC funding has increased significantly over the past eight years, and we, like many institutions, have struggled with sustaining funding and finding the best way for libraries to encourage open access publishing in the future.

Over the past few months, I have analyzed the trends of Dartmouth’s APC fund. Most of the fund’s use is from STEM disciplines (especially the School of Medicine). APC charges have remained relatively stable over time. Somewhat surprisingly, the journals for which faculty request APC funds represent a wide variety of open access journals, not just large publishers such as Elsevier or Wiley. Finally, faculty, especially non-tenured and junior faculty, tend to request APC funds multiple times.

As we at the Dartmouth Library thinks about the future of the APC fund, we are faced with a complicated choice. The APC fund is a popular program with faculty, so decreasing the number of funded requests would not be well received. As more publishers utilize APCs, the library cannot simply increase funding indefinitely. What is the best way to encourage open access publishing? Should we focus funding on graduate students and postdocs? Should we focus funding on persons of color, women, LGBTQ+, or other disadvantaged groups? Should we repurpose the fund to encourage new kinds of scholarly publishing? The answer to all of these questions of course is yes, and the library is attempting to manage that transition within the limitations of an already existing APC fund budget.

Speakers
SM

Shawn Martin

Head of Scholarly Communication, Dartmouth Library


Monday May 4, 2020 1:15pm - 2:15pm EDT
Zoom2

1:15pm EDT

Next Generation Library Publishing Infrastructure

Library publishers play an increasingly integral role in the publication and distribution of scholarly research. We should insist that the publishing tools and services we use are sustainable, address the varied needs of our academic communities, and reflect our values as institutions committed to the open exchange of knowledge worldwide. Come to this session to learn about the exciting work underway in the $2.5M "Next Gen Library Publishing" project, funded by Arcadia and including the following partners: Educopia, California Digital Library, Stratos, COAR, Lyrasis, and Longleaf. Part values articulation, part infrastructure design, part open-source community governance model development -- this project seeks to transform the landscape of library publishing in ways that ensure the open exchange of knowledge within a sustainable and academy-aligned ecosystem. After an introduction to the project, the speakers will engage with the audience in a requirements-gathering exercise.

Speakers
avatar for Katherine Skinner

Katherine Skinner

Executive Director, Educopia Institute
Dr. Katherine Skinner is the Executive Director of the Educopia Institute, a not-for-profit educational organization that empowers collaborative communities to create, share, and preserve knowledge. She has helped to found the MetaArchive Cooperative, a community-owned and commun... Read More →
avatar for Kristen Ratan

Kristen Ratan

Principal, Stratos (Strategies for Open Science)
Kristen Ratan is the Principal of Strategies for Open Science (Stratos), working with open science funders, advocates, and infrastructure providers to produce tangible results towards open scholarship. Kristen has a 20+ year history working to accelerate advances in science and research... Read More →
avatar for Catherine Mitchell

Catherine Mitchell

Director of Publishing, Archives, and Digitization, California Digital Library, California


Monday May 4, 2020 1:15pm - 2:15pm EDT
Zoom1

2:15pm EDT

Break
Monday May 4, 2020 2:15pm - 2:45pm EDT
TBA

2:45pm EDT

Focus Group: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committee Charge
Join the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Task Force for a conversation on the charge being drafted to lead the LPC's proposed standing DEI Committee. This document attempts to articulate a standard of community culture and to imagine a DEI leadership role within the LPC. We believe that community commentary will be essential in order to craft a charge for this group that truly reflects the beliefs and needs of our organization. We invite you to view the charge and to join us in conversation.

Speakers
avatar for Harrison W. Inefuku

Harrison W. Inefuku

Scholarly Publishing Services Librarian, Iowa State University
Harrison W. Inefuku is the scholarly publishing services librarian at Iowa State University, where he is overseeing the devleopment of lowa State's library publishing program. He has been active with diversity and inclusion initiatives at the national level and has spoken and published... Read More →
HN

Hanni Nabahe

Research Librarian, OER Specialist, University of Virginia Library
avatar for Willa Camille Liburd

Willa Camille Liburd

Research Impact and Open Scholarship Librarian, IU BLOOMINGTON
Hi! In my work I manage open scholarship resources at IU Bloomington Libraries and provide publication data and data analysis to library administration, as well as colleges and departments, for institutional decision-making. I am committed to advancing inclusion and belonging in my... Read More →
avatar for Michelle Wilson

Michelle Wilson

Digital Publishing Librarian, Columbia University
avatar for Joshua Neds-Fox

Joshua Neds-Fox

Coordinator for Digital Publishing, Wayne State University Libraries


Monday May 4, 2020 2:45pm - 3:45pm EDT
Zoom2

2:45pm EDT

Creative Staffing Solutions for Library Publishing: Layout, Graphic Design, Copyediting, Project Management, and More

Like many areas of librarianship, the library publishing community is increasingly challenged to do more with less. As library publishers, we aim to offer traditional publishing services such as consultation about the publishing lifecycle, hosting of content and its long-term preservation, along with more uncommon services such as copyediting, layout, graphic design, and project management. Library publishing programs also face new demands for support for digital scholarship and digital humanities programs. In this panel, three institutions will discuss their staffing solutions for their publishing programs. These programs range from new to established; support ranges from one librarian to a department with several staff positions. Representatives from the University of Kansas, Pacific University, and the University of Florida will share strategies, lessons learned, and planned next steps for future initiatives.

In this session, attendees are invited to breakout rooms to discuss staffing strategies, questions, and concerns in smaller groups. Groups have the opportunity to share takeaways aloud during the session, or with notes in shared Google Docs. We look forward to discussing and learning together!

Notes and slides are available on Google Drive: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1HkCGPkYgDqXeUybgucr-GthC2dm3kX99?usp=sharing.

Speakers
avatar for Marianne Reed

Marianne Reed

Digital Publishing & Repository Manager, University of Kansas Libraries
avatar for Chelsea Johnston

Chelsea Johnston

Scholarly Publishing & Repository Librarian, University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries
JM

Johanna Meetz

Ohio State University



Monday May 4, 2020 2:45pm - 3:45pm EDT
Zoom1

3:45pm EDT

Break
Monday May 4, 2020 3:45pm - 4:00pm EDT
TBA

4:00pm EDT

Ask the Editors: Expanded Uses for Faculty Needs Assessments
This presentation will share initial findings from a survey of faculty members engaged in editorial tasks (n = 44), conducted at the Florida State University Libraries in the Spring semester of 2018, and discuss how FSU Libraries utilized the survey to accomplish growth in our own library services. The research questions we sought to answer included the perceived values of commercial publishing services and publishing platform functionality as well as faculty perceptions of library-based open access publishing initiatives. In addition to providing data that informed the development of our own nascent library publishing services, the survey also served as a valuable marketing device to promote existing services and begin building relationships with supportive faculty members.

This presentation will describe the survey itself, including the research design, methodology, and results, and will also report on the initiatives that followed the survey. For example, our team used the results to inform the development of a library publishing strategic plan, a series of forums for faculty editors, and a number of publishing projects, including two open textbooks and two new journal publications. The originally proposed interactive component will be replaced with a live Q&A where presenters will discuss strategies for participants to develop their own research design and strategies to use their own surveys as a marketing tool for their own institution’s publishing services.

Speakers
avatar for Devin Soper

Devin Soper

Director, Office of Digital Research & Scholarship, Florida State University
avatar for Matthew Hunter

Matthew Hunter

Digital Scholarship Librarian, Florida State University
Digital Humanities, Virtual Reality, Library Publishing, Immersive Scholarship, Cultural Heritage
avatar for Laura Miller

Laura Miller

Visiting Open Publishing Librarian, Florida State University


Monday May 4, 2020 4:00pm - 5:00pm EDT
Zoom2

4:00pm EDT

Managing Pressbooks: Developing and Maintaining a Library Publishing Program With Open Source Software

This session/workshop will present an opportunity for attendees to discuss and share strategies and tactics around installing, maintaining, and using Pressbooks, the open source publishing platform. At this experimental interactive session, attendees will "open the hood" of their Pressbooks environments to examine solutions, setbacks, and conundrums. We will dive deep into the weeds of open source plugins, local versus remote hosting, working with end users, and anything Pressbooks-related. For those who are new to Pressbooks, this session will be an opportunity to learn more about what is involved in using it.

Moderators
avatar for Jeremy Smith

Jeremy Smith

Moving Image and Audio Archivist, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Manage the Open Education program at UMass Amherst.

Monday May 4, 2020 4:00pm - 5:00pm EDT
Zoom1
 
Tuesday, May 5
 

12:00pm EDT

Diversity Initiatives in Libraries and Publishing: What Can We Learn from Each Other?
It’s no secret that both publishing and librarianship are overwhelmingly white - surveys find the numbers in each field at over 80%. One of the steps both groups are taking to create a more diverse workforce is funding fellowship programs to improve the involvement of underrepresented communities. This panel brings together participants from library and university press diversity initiatives to discuss their experiences in these programs. Panelists will share what worked well for them, what’s worked less well, and offer suggestions for how attendees can support diversity, equity, and inclusion in their publishing operations.

We’ll discuss the following questions:
- What can we gain from thinking about diversity, equity, and inclusion in the two connected industries of libraries and publishing?
- In what ways can fellowships for people from underrepresented backgrounds avoid tokenizing fellows who participate in those programs?
- How can we think of fellowships as working alongside other ongoing efforts to support diversity, equity, and inclusion (like diversifying hiring practices), instead of seeing fellowships as a replacement for those ongoing efforts?
- How do we measure success in diversity initiatives and support retention of participants after the fellowship program?

Panelists will include current and past participants in the ARL Kaleidoscope Diversity Scholars and AUP Mellon Diversity Fellows programs, as well as a university press staff member who works to support diverse groups of interns and work-study students.

Cosponsored by the Association of University Presses Library Relations Committee and Equity, Inclusion, and Justice Committee.

Speakers
avatar for Lanell White

Lanell White

Director of Sales, Marketing, and Outreach, Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan
avatar for Stephanie Elliott Prieto

Stephanie Elliott Prieto

Publicist & Web Manage, Wesleyan Univesity Press
My presentation is with AUPresses\\' Equity, Justice, and Inclusion committee. I am talking about opportunities / skill building for work-study students. You can talk to me about digital initiatives if you like as well. Wesleyan has an open access program, for 2 dozen dance and theater... Read More →
LH

Liz Hamilton

Copyright Librarian, Northwestern University Libraries
avatar for María García

María García

Acquisitions Assistant, MIT Press



Tuesday May 5, 2020 12:00pm - 1:00pm EDT
Zoom1

1:00pm EDT

Break
Tuesday May 5, 2020 1:00pm - 1:15pm EDT
TBA

1:15pm EDT

Helping a journal apply to PMC when you’ve never done it before: Case study and indexing best practices discussion
In this interactive session, Scholastica will share actionable insights on how to help a journal navigate the technical aspects of the PubMed Central (PMC) application process when you’re also new to it. We will present a case study on how we worked with the editors of a campus-based medical journal to learn the requirements for inclusion in PMC, implement the necessary technical criteria, and process their application. Speaking from the vendor perspective, Scholastica will overview how to break out the editorial and technical aspects of journal indexing, and how to work with your publishing vendor(s), or your internal publishing and typesetting technology team, to ensure that your journals are able to fulfill the requirements for PMC and other major scholarly databases and indexes, such as the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). We’ll also delve into indexing metadata best practices, including registering Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) for all articles. After the presentation, the session will open up into a collaborative discussion around top indexes for STEM journals, common technical indexing requirements, indexing dos and don’ts, and questions from the audience. Attendees will also receive a worksheet that they can use to help guide journal indexing applications.

Speakers
avatar for Brian Cody

Brian Cody

Co-Founder and CEO, Scholastica


Tuesday May 5, 2020 1:15pm - 2:15pm EDT
Zoom2

1:15pm EDT

The OER Starter Kit Workbook

Developed by Abbey Elder, the OER Starter Kit remixed OER primers and courses to “equip instructors with the skills they need to confidently find, use, or even create open educational resources” (2019). To extend this resource’s usefulness, Stacy Katz and Elder created accompanying ancillaries for the handbook in the form of interactive online worksheets incorporated directly into a copy of the original handbook. Katz and Elder created these worksheets with three goals in mind:
First, to provide a space for faculty to reflect on OER;
second, to practice skills in writing for the web, such as adding alt text to images; and
third, to act as a planning guide for adopting and creating OER.

In this session, participants will learn about the OER Starter Kit Workbook and how it, along with its new ancillaries, were incorporated into the Manifold platform. Manifold, an open source platform for scholarly publishing, provides annotation tools to dialogue privately, publicly, or in a group. By incorporating the new ancillary worksheets into Manifold through Google Docs, the authors intend this new workbook edition of Elder’s work to be of use to those facilitating OER initiatives as well as to faculty who do not have a point person for OER on their campus.

Along with the participants, we will explore the worksheets we created and how they might be integrated into professional development programs for OER and how faculty might use these resources for reflective practice. In addition to this work, participants will have an opportunity to revise and remix worksheets as well as create new ones.

Speakers
avatar for Abbey K. Elder

Abbey K. Elder

Open Access & Scholarly Communication Librarian, Iowa State University
Abbey Elder is the Open Access & Scholarly Communication Librarian at Iowa State University. Her work uplifts and supports instructors who are interested in open education, open access publishing, and other scholarly communication topics. Over the past four years, Abbey has greatly... Read More →
avatar for Stacy Katz

Stacy Katz

Open Resources Librarian, Lehman College, CUNY
avatar for Jojo Karlin

Jojo Karlin

Manifold Graduate Fellow, Graduate Center, CUNY, English department
While finishing my PhD in English at the CUNY Graduate Center, I've had the distinct pleasure of working on Manifold Scholarship with Matt Gold, The University of Minnesota Press, and Cast Iron Coding, and with generous funding from the Mellon Foundation. I'm happy to talk about Manifold... Read More →


Tuesday May 5, 2020 1:15pm - 2:15pm EDT
Zoom1

2:15pm EDT

Break
Tuesday May 5, 2020 2:15pm - 2:45pm EDT
TBA

2:45pm EDT

Sustaining Open-Source Community Publishing Platforms: Strategies and Practices
This panel focuses on the sustainability practices and strategies that open-source community publishing platforms can pursue as they seek to sustain themselves when grant funding ends. It brings together representatives—Matthew K. Gold, Susan Doerr, and Zach Davis—from the founding partners of Manifold Scholarship, an open source publishing platform funded by the Mellon Foundation, with John Maxwell and Kathleen Fitzpatrick for a discussion of the challenges involved in making publishing initiatives and open platforms sustainable. In his 2019 report “Mind the Gap,” John Maxwell presented an overview of open publishing tools and platforms. Maxwell argues that "open publishing needs new infrastructure that incentivizes sustainability, cooperation, collaboration, and integration," and points to the ways in which existing infrastructure foster sustainability. Maxwell's articulation of the structural challenges involved in achieving sustainability have resonances with Kathleen Fitzpatrick’s recent book, Generous Thinking, which argues that institutions need to take collaborative, rather than competitive, approaches in the face of the austerity measures being experienced by many public educational systems in the wake of rampant privatization.

In this panel, Maxwell will frame the larger sustainability context facing open community platforms. The discussion will be grounded in the immediate challenges facing real-world projects like Manifold and Humanities Commons, which are both creating community support models for their continued development. Following Maxwell’s presentation on strategies and challenges, Doerr, Davis, and Gold will share Manifold’s approach to sustainability from business, technical, institutional, and social perspectives. Fitzpatrick will then focus on Humanities Commons and its approach to sustainability. The panel as a whole will provide attendees with a clear picture of the challenges involved in open-source community publishing but also a set of direct strategies they can employ for their own projects. During the Q&A, we will put into practice the community-centered thinking needed to foster open scholarly ecosystems.

Speakers
avatar for Kathleen Fitzpatrick

Kathleen Fitzpatrick

Director of Digital Humanities, Michigan State University
Kathleen Fitzpatrick is Director of Scholarly Communication of the Modern Language Association and Visiting Research Professor of English at NYU.  She is author of Planned Obsolescence:  Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy (NYU Press, 2011) and of The Anxiety... Read More →
avatar for Matthew K. Gold

Matthew K. Gold

Associate Prof of English and Digital Humanities, CUNY Graduate Center
http://twitter.com/mkgold
avatar for Zach Davis

Zach Davis

President, Cast Iron Coding
Zach Davis is the president of Cast Iron Coding, a web development studio in Portland, OR. He received his Ph.D. in English from the CUNY Graduate Center, and taught in the CUNY system for many years before founding Cast Iron. He is the technical lead on Manifold Scholarship and is... Read More →
avatar for Susan Doerr

Susan Doerr

Associate Director, University of Minnesota Press
Susan Doerr, the Associate Director at the University of Minnesota Press, is a twenty-two year publishing veteran with experience in literary, corporate, and scholarly publishing and distribution. Susan manages the Manifold Scholarship (www.manifoldapp.org) partnership with the CUNY... Read More →
avatar for John W. Maxwell

John W. Maxwell

Associate Professor, Publishing @ SFU, Simon Fraser University
Associate Prof and Director of the Publishing Studies program at Simon Fraser University. I teach and do research on the publishing industries and their ongoing encounter with the digital paradigm.


Tuesday May 5, 2020 2:45pm - 3:45pm EDT
Zoom2

2:45pm EDT

Decoding the Directory: Library Publishing Directory Focus Group Session

The Library Publishing Directory provides an overview of the activities, technologies, organizational structure, partnerships, and priorities of library publishers worldwide. In the seven years since the first Directory was released, the library publishing landscape has evolved, with changes to the types of publications produced, services provided, platforms used, and more. In preparing for the most recent edition, the LPC decided to revisit the directory’s data model, asking whether the data we collect reflects the current state of the field and meets the purposes originally outlined for the Directory: introduce readers to library publishing, facilitate collaboration between publishers and other publishing entities, and enable benchmarking. To this end, the LPC formed a task force in the Spring of 2019 to evaluate the current data model and the survey used to collect such information.

Led by the LPC Directory Committee, this session aims to continue the work of this task force, turning directly to LPC members for feedback on the directory’s data model and survey. After briefly reviewing the recent changes made to the 2020 Directory as a result of the task force’s work, this interactive session will ask attendees (the focus group) to share thoughts on additional considerations for future Directories, including:
--How to best capture the evolving relationship between university presses and library publishing programs
--How to best capture the full breadth of what we publish, such as emerging publication types and legacy journals
--Identifying a subset of Directory questions that are more broadly applicable than the current in-depth survey
--General feedback on any gaps in data collection or responses to the directory’s purpose.

Feedback from participants will help shape the data model and survey process moving forward.

Speakers
avatar for Robert Browder

Robert Browder

Publishing Specialist, Virginia Tech University Libraries, Publishing Services Department
Specialties include management of resources and invention of workflows associated with publishing online open access scholarly journals and books.
avatar for Amanda Wentworth

Amanda Wentworth

OER Publishing Coordinator, SUNY Geneseo
avatar for Janet Swatscheno

Janet Swatscheno

Digital Publishing Librarian, University of Illinois Chicago
avatar for Ellen Dubinsky

Ellen Dubinsky

Scholarly Communication Librarian, University of Arizona
avatar for Jessica Kirschner

Jessica Kirschner

Open Educational Resources Librarian, Virginia Commonwealth University


Tuesday May 5, 2020 2:45pm - 3:45pm EDT
Zoom1

3:45pm EDT

Break
Tuesday May 5, 2020 3:45pm - 4:00pm EDT
TBA

4:00pm EDT

How Instructional Design & OER Can Redefine What’s Possible for Library Publishing
Open licenses and emerging technology are enabling a revolution in instructional design and educational publishing. Traditional approaches to both publishing and instructional design often relied on the static, linear format of the printed book. Now that it’s possible to create and distribute learning materials digitally under open licenses, there is both an opportunity and a mandate to apply apply the findings of learning science to improve both teaching & learning materials and the learning experience of the learners served by institutions of higher education.

By offering no-cost digital and low-cost print alternatives to expensive proprietary content, open, collaborative content creation platforms (like Pressbooks) make it easier for librarians, instructors, and learners to collaborate in low-risk experiments in teaching and learning, including faculty/student co-authorship of learning materials, enriched digital-first textbook publishing practices, modular open content adaptation, and more.

There’s no better way to lead than by example; in this panel, two experienced instructional designers working on OER development and open pedagogy projects will join the founder of a popular open content creation platform to showcase successful projects at their institutions that are being put to use in real classrooms today. The intention of this showcase is to share lessons learned and proven development workflows, foster a greater exchange between the professional domains of library publishing and instructional design, and provide generative models and opportunities for collaboration among institutions interested in building new resources or adapting existing material better suited to meet the needs of learners.

Speakers
avatar for Hugh McGuire

Hugh McGuire

Founder and CEO, @pressbooks
Would love to connect about: system-level OER strategy, the power of creating new resources, open pedagogy, instructional design and AI. Pressbooks is an online content & courseware development platform.For years, Pressbooks has supported the authoring and adaptation of open educational... Read More →


Tuesday May 5, 2020 4:00pm - 5:00pm EDT
Zoom2

4:00pm EDT

This Workshop is a Podcast

Podcasting has become a common vehicle for journalism and audio drama, for entertainment and education. But can podcasts be a form of scholarly communication? As digital and multimedia publishing offer new and intriguing pathways to public consumption, scholars are exploring alternatives to traditional publication venues that may increase the reach and audience for their research. Generated outside the existing systems of review, evaluation, and publication that structure the lifecycle of traditional formats such as monographs and articles, podcasts also present challenges to scholars and publishers in quality control, dissemination, archiving and academic recognition.

In this workshop, participants will think critically about podcasting as a new form of scholarly communications by creating a podcast of their own! Attendees will participate in a guided discussion and work collaboratively in small groups to write a script. Groups will make and edit a recording using open source software and publish their podcast audio and transcript online.

This program is inspired by the “Podcast in an Hour” workshop run by Columbia University Libraries’ digital publishing program, an endeavor that engages students, through active learning, in a critical exploration of new forms of scholarly communication, as well as introducing new technical skills. A short presentation on the pilot year of this program (a Podcast Essentials speaker series; a collaborativePodcast Club; and the development of a partnership program modeled on our institutional journal publishing partnerships) will close the workshop. Library publishing professionals curious about developing podcasting services for their institutions will leave equipped with information about our experiences building an equipment library, writing policies and documentation, and creating podcast publishing infrastructure. We will highlight concerns for thoughtful program development including access and accessibility, writing and communicating for new audiences, rights and licensing for audio content, and discoverability and impact.

Speakers
avatar for Michelle Wilson

Michelle Wilson

Digital Publishing Librarian, Columbia University



Tuesday May 5, 2020 4:00pm - 5:00pm EDT
Zoom1
 
Wednesday, May 6
 

12:00pm EDT

Poster: Developing OER Publishing Support: A Case Study
The University of Houston Libraries (UHL) launched its open educational resources (OER) program in 2018, including an incentive program for the adoption, adaptation, and creation of OER in place of traditional textbooks. Interest in creating OER was higher than expected, prompting the need to increase support for OER publishing. This case study shares activities and lessons learned from an institution that is new to OER support and does not have established library publishing services. The main strategies to support OER publishing at UHL are providing funding through the OER incentive program, copyright and Creative Commons licensing guidance, and offering Pressbooks as an authoring tool.

A lesson learned is the need to determine available capacity to support OER publishing by evaluating the time and resources needed alongside institutional and program goals. Additionally, it is important to communicate the services UHL does not provide, such as peer-review, editing, and proofreading. This presentation shares an intentionally scaled-down model for supporting OER publishing and a perspective from an institution that is exploring and developing in this area.

Speakers
avatar for Ariana Santiago

Ariana Santiago

Head of Open Education Services, University of Houston



Wednesday May 6, 2020 12:00pm - 1:00pm EDT
Zoom1

12:00pm EDT

Poster: Driving more Green OA: The Advancing Hyku project
Advancing Hyku is a collaborative project running from 2019-2021 to support the growth of green open access through institutional repositories, by introducing significant structural improvements and new features to the Samvera Community's Hyku platform. The project partners are University of Virginia Library, Ubiquity Press and the British Library, with funding from Arcadia, a charitable fund of philanthropists Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin. This poster will outline the project and present the outputs of the project to date.

Speakers
avatar for Brian Hole

Brian Hole

CEO, Ubiquity Press



Wednesday May 6, 2020 12:00pm - 1:00pm EDT
Zoom1

12:00pm EDT

Poster: Enriching Digitized Books with Supplemental Materials (canceled)
Since 2018, Michigan Publishing, a division of the University of Michigan Library, has been engaged in a Mellon/NEH Humanities Open Book grant project. The goal of the project is to digitize select books published by three Asian studies centers at the University of Michigan over the last sixty years. Approximately one hundred books will be digitized, and twenty of these will be updated with new editions and enriched with multimedia when they are released on Fulcrum, a publishing platform designed to host books together with related audiovisual materials. In this talk, I will report on the ongoing process of multimedia enrichment. How do we identify titles for enrichment? How do we consider reach, impact, academic discipline, and medium? How do we secure materials once identified? What intellectual property and technical issues arise? Where I can, I will consider how our project compares to others in this space.
Keywords: digital projects, platform implementation, digital humanities collaborations, workflows, copyright, open access publishing

Wednesday May 6, 2020 12:00pm - 1:00pm EDT
Zoom1

12:00pm EDT

Poster: How to "Publish Online...": Web-Based Outputs Beyond PDF and EPUB
Most of us export documents to PDF and EPUB in order to publish them online, yet directly below InDesign's familiar "Export" option lies the enigmatic "Publish Online..." This seemingly redundant menu item is, in fact, a gateway to something altogether different—a variety of options for publishing documents as Web-based installations that can make your work more dynamic, more interactive, and more accessible. This session will cover the basics of these formats and provide tips for navigating the choices they offer. When does it make sense to "Publish Online..." versus just hosting a PDF? Where do you gain from embedding a document in an existing page and where is it better to let it stand alone? What different uses are served by the HTML output from "Publish Online...", the HTML from an EPUB, and exported XML (especially now that most browsers support direct display of XML)? Whether you are using InDesign or another desktop publishing platform, there is a lot more that goes into preparing a document for each of these outputs than one presentation can cover, but this talk will get you started choosing the right option(s) for your project.

Speakers
avatar for Race MoChridhe

Race MoChridhe

Scholarly Communication Coordinator, Atla



Wednesday May 6, 2020 12:00pm - 1:00pm EDT
Zoom1

12:00pm EDT

Poster: Library Publishing Workflows Preliminary Findings
Library Publishing Workflows (LPW) is a two-year, IMLS-funded project to investigate, compare, and model diverse scholarly journal publishing workflows. Educopia Institute and the Library Publishing Coalition are working with 12 partner libraries to create documentation and models of workflows employed by journal publishing programs, with the goal of increasing the capacity of libraries to publish open access, peer-reviewed scholarly journals.

This poster will present preliminary findings from the first round of interviews for the LPW project. LPW staff conducted are conducting interviews with library publishers from November 2019 through March 2020, focusing on the skills, services, and infrastructure used by libraries—including the actions they perform in house or outsource, the personnel involved in the process, and the tools and platforms used. We will be able to share common pain points and frustrations, and point to trends and areas of divergence amongst the participants. We also hope this poster can be a space for conversation amongst Forum attendees, to discuss similar frustrations and pain points in their own processes.

Speakers
BL

Brandon Locke

Project Manager - Library Publishing Workflows, Educopia Institute



Wednesday May 6, 2020 12:00pm - 1:00pm EDT
Zoom1

12:00pm EDT

Poster: Mapping Libraries and Open Access Publishing in the Liberal Arts at Amherst College
The Amherst College Library makes significant contributions to the open access publishing landscape. This poster will provide an overview or “map” of the staffing and institutional resources involved in supporting two open access presses housed at Amherst College Library: Amherst College Press, the only open access press located in a liberal arts college, and Lever Press, an innovative open access press funded through a consortium of liberal arts college libraries, of which Amherst College is a founding member. The director and assistant acquisitions editor of both Lever and Amherst College Press are based in the library and work closely with various library departments and staff members on a range of projects and initiatives. By mapping the links, collaborations, and reciprocities between press and library activities within the larger ecology of a liberal arts campus, this poster will highlight opportunities and challenges to Amherst’s model and provide an opportunity for conversations about how liberal arts college libraries can engage in academic publishing and open access efforts.

Speakers
avatar for Este Pope

Este Pope

Head of Digital Programs, Amherst College
HB

Hannah Brooks-Motl

Assistant Acquisitions Editor, Amherst College Press and Lever Press



Wednesday May 6, 2020 12:00pm - 1:00pm EDT
Zoom1

1:00pm EDT

Break
Wednesday May 6, 2020 1:00pm - 1:15pm EDT
TBA

1:15pm EDT

Round Peg in a Square Hole? Positioning the University Press and its Personnel for Success Within a Library Organization
The trend of university presses to migrate under the organizational umbrella of libraries has prompted robust discussion about how to move beyond a mere administrative arrangement to achieve true integration. While these conversations have duly noted certain value alignments between presses and libraries and potential malalignments of their respective business models, they have occluded a key organizational factor in the level of integration: the (in)equity of status, i.e. faculty, staff, or other, between press and library personnel. At universities where the press director reports to the dean/head of libraries, the director’s status often reflects the level of integration between the two organizations and is often commensurate with the extent of benefits the merger affords both parties. This panel features three press directors who report to a dean/head of libraries and hold a faculty position within the organization. Case studies of their respective institutions suggest that equity of status within the library minimizes competing interests between the press and library while allowing for mutual learning and growth. When career advancement inside or outside the institution is not tied solely to profit-and-loss statements, press directors are better positioned to support broadly open-access initiatives; libraries are better positioned to support scholarly communications with a publishing expert on the team whose job responsibilities are keyed to a shared mission.

Speakers
avatar for Charles Watkinson

Charles Watkinson

Director, University of Michigan Press, University of Michigan
I'm AUL for Publishing at University of Michigan Library and Director of University of Michigan Press. I'm particularly interested in next-gen institutional repositories, the future of ebook collections and acquisitions, and how books can also get to participate in the networked digital... Read More →
avatar for John D. Morgenstern

John D. Morgenstern

Director, Clemson University Press, Clemson University
Scholarly publishing
avatar for Lisa Quinn

Lisa Quinn

Director, Wilfrid Laurier University Press


Wednesday May 6, 2020 1:15pm - 2:15pm EDT
Zoom2

1:15pm EDT

LPC Community in Conversation: Let’s Discuss Publishing Platforms

Library Publishing programs tend to use one (or a few) of many options available for reviewing and/or hosting the content that they publish. Often, library publishers don’t have the opportunity to benchmark how they use these platforms with others in the publishing community, and don’t have a formal community of practice around these platforms. If you are using Open Journal Systems (OJS), WordPress, JaneWay, PubPub, Manifold, or another publishing platform in your publishing work, or are interested in hearing from those who do, please join this informal face-to-face discussion group meeting. Come with your questions, experiences, and thoughts to share! We will facilitate smaller discussion groups around these platforms, and allow for time to share out with the larger group as well. This session proposal is in response to the community calls hosted by the Library Publishing Coalition in July and November 2019, on the topics of WordPress and OJS. The participants noted that more regular meetings and discussions around the topic of platform usage would be a helpful collaboration opportunity, and a way to establish a community of practice to continue these conversations throughout the year.

Speakers
avatar for Amanda Hurford

Amanda Hurford

Scholarly Communications Director, PALNI
avatar for Race MoChridhe

Race MoChridhe

Scholarly Communication Coordinator, Atla
avatar for Ally Laird

Ally Laird

Open Publishing Program Coordinator, Penn State University Libraries


Wednesday May 6, 2020 1:15pm - 2:15pm EDT
Zoom1

2:15pm EDT

Break
Wednesday May 6, 2020 2:15pm - 2:45pm EDT
TBA

2:45pm EDT

Creativity at the Forefront: User-oriented and Shared Infrastructure Services: A user-centric and qualitative approach to development of university press editorial services
Stockholm University Press was founded five years ago at Stockholm University Library, and has quickly become a part of an international movement with smaller publising entities closer to academia (Deville et al., 2019). The Press is a ‘scholar-led’ organisation, meaning that all publishing decisions are made by a Publishing Committee. The journals and book series are also managed by the researchers with support from the Press staff. This organisation an integral part of the University Library, where the vision is to provid a more user-driven service model with focus on Open Research. The Press organisation has had to gradually build trust in their services by producing good examples of interesting and widely used publications as well as giving good service to Authors and Editors, and this work is still ongoing.

The services provided by Stockholm University Press is thus under constant enhancement. The Press team worked with some specific projects during 2018 and 2019 to deliver what the users need when they need it to a greater extent. Particular challenges for the management of book projects have been the editorial process with book proposals, peer-review, board recommendations and submission of full manuscript files. In 2018 the team worked with an iterative editing process to improve instructions and communications sent from the system in order to make the system easier to use. The process was informed by common questions and mistakes and our own experiences from trying to nudge reviewers and editors to use the system appropriately. The developments are, furthermore, informed by usage statistics and citation patterns to ensure that the Press delivers content relevant to the readership (Wennström et al., 2019). This presentation aims to describe the challenges and opportunities with a user-oriented process and the outcome of the improvements.

Speakers
avatar for Sofie Wennström

Sofie Wennström

Analyst/Managing Editor, Stockholm University, LIBER
Sofie Wennström is working at Stockholm University Library as an Analyst and as a Managing Editor for books and journals at Stockholm University Press. During 2021 she is also serving as a Project Manager at the National Library of Sweden with the task to set up a national digit... Read More →


Wednesday May 6, 2020 2:45pm - 3:45pm EDT
Zoom2

2:45pm EDT

Creativity at the Forefront: User-oriented and Shared Infrastructure Services: That’s a pretty big job, eh? Supporting Open Infrastructure in Canada - Lessons from Coalition Publica
North of the 49th parallel, an ambitious national project is afoot to build open infrastructure for digital scholarly publishing and research. Known as Coalition Publica (www.coalition-publi.ca), this project is spearheaded by partners Érudit and the Public Knowledge Project (PKP), two long-established Canadian leaders in scholarly communication.
Officially launched in 2017, Coalition Publica has developed both technical infrastructure and a harmonized suite of services in consultation with the Canadian scholarly communications community, combining PKP’s Open Journal Systems (OJS) and Érudit’s centralized dissemination platform (erudit.org). Almost 40 journals, based at 20 different hosting institutions, are now benefiting from Coalition Publica’s infrastructure and services.
But providing support across the miles—sorry, kilometres—isn’t easy and the Coalition Publica team has learned valuable lessons about supporting open infrastructure in a distributed context, in areas such as coordinating distributed teams, de/centralizing information, managing documentation, and communications with stakeholders. Jessica Clark, Coalition Publica Project Coordinator, and James MacGregor, PKP’s Associate Director of Strategic Projects and Services, will share their experiences of marshalling a distributed support network across 10 provinces, two official languages, and a growing number of evolving priorities.
While the Canadian context presents some unique challenges, Coalition Publica’s experience may be informative for other open infrastructure projects, seeing as these are an increasingly common approach to providing national-level scholarly publishing support. James and Jessica also hope to exchange with LPF attendees about their challenges and successes in supporting open infrastructure or similar distributed projects.

Speakers
avatar for James MacGregor

James MacGregor

Managing Director (Interim), Public Knowledge Project
James MacGregor is currently the interim Managing Director of the Public Knowledge Project (PKP). He has been working with PKP since 2007, and has dabbled in documentation writing, development, support, and outreach over the years. James coordinated the development of PKP's Publishing... Read More →
avatar for Jessica Clark

Jessica Clark

Senior Coordinator, Open Access Development, Érudit
Jessica Clark is Senior Coordinator, Open Access Development at Érudit. Most recently, she was the Project Coordinator of Coalition Publica, a partnership between Érudit and the Public Knowledge Project to advance research dissemination and digital scholarly publishing in Canada... Read More →


Wednesday May 6, 2020 2:45pm - 3:45pm EDT
Zoom2

2:45pm EDT

Creativity at the Forefront: User-oriented and Shared Infrastructure Services: University Journals: An open access publishing platform owned by universities and linked to repositories
University Journals: an open access publishing platform, owned by universities and linked to repositories.

Thirteen universities from four European countries launched University Journals (UJ) as an alternative to the current journal ecosystem that often charges article publication charges or requires authors to transfer their copyright.

University Journals aims to provide high quality, reviewed, open access infrastructure for scholarly articles and other products of research. With a focus on convenience for researchers, efficient and cost-effective operation and fast turnaround times, UJ will use the existing repositories and established international journal infrastructure (e.g. with ISSN, DOI and indexing) to publish research, data, software and other forms of academic output. UJ features a novel quality assurance and peer-review strategy that aims to get works published faster and in a more predictable manner.

By building University Journals on the existing repository infrastructure and publishing expertise of the participating university libraries only modest resources are required, while the journal format will help ensure the commitment and acceptance by academic authors as well as readers. UJ is owned and funded by universities, will not charge APCs or require transfer of copyrights, is fully compliant with any open access mandates and supports the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA).

University Journals will also stimulate Open Science practices. Besides articles, other research output (e.g. reports, datasets, replication studies, protocols, methods, software and other research products) can be published quickly in UJ and get indexed by established abstracting services. Copyright and ownership will remain within the universities. University Journals is based on open scholarly standards and infrastructures and provides a valuable addition to modern scholarly communication needed for the transition to Open Science.

Speakers

Wednesday May 6, 2020 2:45pm - 3:45pm EDT
Zoom2

2:45pm EDT

Editorial Control in Library Publishing: Who Does What and Why?

In this context editorial control is about who makes decisions about editorial processes such as manuscript format, who accepts changes to a manuscripts post copyedit, and who defines portions of the process that require collaboration between authors and publishers.

Editorial control can be seen as a continuum. Authors or project owners exist at one end of the continuum and publishers exist at the other.
Who holds editorial control determines how the productive capacity of publishing departments is spent.

The less editorial control publishing departments have, the more of their productive capacity is spent in supporting the authors and project owners who do have editorial control. This is a valid way to create value for one’s community.
The more editorial control publishing departments have, the more they are able to standardize their production processes, thereby creating the ability to publish higher volumes of scholarship. This too is a valid way to create value for one’s community.

In the context of a publishing department that does not have editorial control, productive capacity is initiated through budget and staffing, but determined by the authors and project owners the department chooses to support. The productive capacity of such departments is subject to the skills and experience that project owners bring with them to the collaboration. Thus, partners must be chosen carefully.

In the context of a publishing department that has editorial control, productive capacity is initiated through budget and staffing, but maintained through carefully chosen workflows and a commitment to strictly adhere to those workflows.

When publishers hold editorial control and enforce a systematic process, opportunities for creativity and experimentation in the publication process are diminished for authors/project owners.

Speakers
avatar for Robert Browder

Robert Browder

Publishing Specialist, Virginia Tech University Libraries, Publishing Services Department
Specialties include management of resources and invention of workflows associated with publishing online open access scholarly journals and books.
avatar for Aaron Mccollough

Aaron Mccollough

Product Director (Repositories), Ubiquity Press
avatar for Andrew Lockett

Andrew Lockett

Press Manager, University of Westminster Press
Experienced academic publishing professional: previous roles at Oxford University Press, Routledge, British Film Institute Publishing; mostly editorial in humanities/social sciences; management/general roles. See https://uk.linkedin.com/in/andrew-lockett-3140715. Open access publishing... Read More →
LS

Lara Speicher

Head of Publishing, UCL Press


Wednesday May 6, 2020 2:45pm - 3:45pm EDT
Zoom1

3:45pm EDT

Break
Wednesday May 6, 2020 3:45pm - 4:00pm EDT
TBA

4:00pm EDT

Models for Success: Customizing the Library Publishing Experience: Lessons Learned from Teaching Scholarly Communication Alongside a Student-Run Journal
This presentation will describe the development and evolution of the Scholarly Communication and Open Access Publishing course in the Master of Library and Information Science (MLIS) program at Western University. The course has been offered as an online elective once a year since 2018, and its initial impetus was to provide a sustainable peer review model for the MLIS student-run journal Emerging Library & Information Perspectives (ELIP). Students in the class are tasked with peer reviewing submissions and providing additional quality control during the production process, but the journal complements the curriculum, as opposed to driving it. Experiential learning opportunities are framed within theoretical frameworks that encourage students to critically reflect on common practices in the journal publishing industry, including double blind peer review, the reliance on volunteer labor, and article processing charges. ELIP provides a case study to inform these conversations, and students are ultimately tasked with creating a sustainable open access journal proposal. I will summarize lessons I have learned through teaching this course, ranging from recommendations for structuring experiential and peer learning in an online environment to tips for integrating journal workflows into the curriculum. To conclude, I will argue that courses such as this can be used across disciplines to bridge the scholarly communication divide between theory and practice, placing them in a dialectic relationship of enrichment.

Speakers
avatar for Melissa Seelye

Melissa Seelye

Scholarly Communication Coordinator, San Francisco State University


Wednesday May 6, 2020 4:00pm - 5:00pm EDT
Zoom2

4:00pm EDT

Models for Success: Customizing the Library Publishing Experience: Make it a win-win: Managing student employee experience in library publishing efforts
At Utah State University Libraries, the Digital Initiatives Unit employs up to 15, primarily undergraduate, students who contribute approximately 190 hours of labor on a weekly basis. Students work on a variety of projects related to digital exhibits, digital history collections, open educational resources (OER), and the institutional repository. Their responsibilities range from scanning and metadata creation to OER research and copyediting to occasional outreach and engagement at events. This presentation will explore the benefits and challenges of student labor in library publishing efforts. Topics covered will include: the quality and quantity of work that is given to students; evaluating students’ work and providing opportunities for professional development; efforts to tie students’ work in the library to their studies; and balancing everything with the demands of other stakeholders and partners. The speakers will discuss how they navigate the conflict that sometimes exists between the desire to provide students with opportunities for meaningful engagement with their work and partners’ demands for quick turn-around on projects. Performance evaluations, regular training, and public recognition of student labor will also be discussed. The presentation will offer concrete examples of processes and tools that were tried and tested; while encouraging attendees to share their own examples and ideas. Interactive components will include: small group discussion (think, pair, share), and attendees will be encouraged to submit written questions throughout the presentation using PollEverywhere.

Speakers
avatar for Becky Thoms

Becky Thoms

Head of Digital Initiatives, Utah State University
avatar for Rebecca Nelson

Rebecca Nelson

IR Coordinator, Utah State University
Institutional RepositoryProject ManagementStudent Workers


Wednesday May 6, 2020 4:00pm - 5:00pm EDT
Zoom2

4:00pm EDT

Models for Success: Customizing the Library Publishing Experience: Migrating Journals: Working with Editors
In 2019 Pacific University migrated all journals published via Digital commons to Ubiquity Press’ journal publishing platform. This presentation will discuss that process, with a focus on working with faculty editors who are both located locally as well as across the country. It will focus on: -Communicating with stakeholders about the migration, including journal editors (timing, testing the new platforms, and deciding when to go live) -Training editors to use a new platform (this was a challenge because I never use the same features of the site as the editors do) -Working with editors on site designs (some editors were very particular with the design, others were less invested and both present unique challenges) -Working through growing pains (general dissatisfaction with platform idiosyncrasies) In addition to these issues, I will also briefly discuss some of the more technical/logistical obstacles, like: -How we chose to handle articles that were still in review in the old platform after the new platform went live -How we chose to handle training for an editor who came on board as we were transitioning to the new platform -Making changes to article templates (including cover sheets) to reflect new information (titles, websites, etc) of journals

Speakers
JM

Johanna Meetz

Ohio State University


Wednesday May 6, 2020 4:00pm - 5:00pm EDT
Zoom2

4:00pm EDT

Cultivating Community with the Library Publishing Research Agenda

Recently the LPC Research Committee released the Library Publishing Research Agenda. This document explores areas in which research is needed to support practice in the field of library publishing. The agenda identifies six research topics: Assessment, Labor, Accessibility, Non-Traditional Research Outputs, Peer Review, and Partnerships. The aim of this session is to give the LPC community a dedicated opportunity to discuss, work with, or build on the Research Agenda as well as connect with others interested in similar research areas.

The session will begin with a brief overview of the Library Publishing Research Agenda presented by members of the Research Committee. We will then break into groups corresponding to the agenda’s topics. Within these groups, participants may work in a variety of ways. Examples include:

-Developing specific research questions to share with the wider community
-Identifying individuals with shared research interests
-Brainstorming and planning collaborative projects
-Providing constructive feedback to incorporate into future iterations of the agenda

While the goal of this session is to provide an opportunity to work with or build on the Research Agenda, participants are under no obligation to produce “deliverables.” We want attendees to learn from one another and make contributions to library publishing research in whatever manner they are most comfortable.

The structure of the session is as follows:
-Introduction to the Library Publishing Research Agenda (5 minutes)
-Divide into groups (5 minutes)
-Group discussion/work time (35 minutes)
-Groups report out (15 minutes)

Speakers
JB

Jason Boczar

Digital Scholarship and Publishing Librarian, University of South Florida
Jason Boczar is the Digital Scholarship and Publishing Librarian at the University of South Florida. He received his MLIS from the University of Kentucky in 2012.
avatar for Liz Bedford

Liz Bedford

Scholarly Publishing Outreach Librarian, University of Washington
University of Washington Libraries
TA

Talea Anderson

Scholarly Communication Librarian, Washington State University
CG

Corinne Guimont

Digital Scholarship Coordinator, Virginia Tech
avatar for Ian Harmon

Ian Harmon

Scholarly Communications Librarian, West Virginia University Libraries
avatar for Sarah Wipperman

Sarah Wipperman

Scholarly Communications Librarian, Villanova University


Wednesday May 6, 2020 4:00pm - 5:00pm EDT
Zoom1
 
Thursday, May 7
 

12:00pm EDT

Managing Pressbooks: Developing and Maintaining a Library Publishing Program With Open Source Software

This session/workshop will present an opportunity for attendees to discuss and share strategies and tactics around installing, maintaining, and using Pressbooks, the open source publishing platform. At this experimental interactive session, attendees will "open the hood" of their Pressbooks environments to examine solutions, setbacks, and conundrums. We will dive deep into the weeds of open source plugins, local versus remote hosting, working with end users, and anything Pressbooks-related. For those who are new to Pressbooks, this session will be an opportunity to learn more about what is involved in using it.

Moderators
avatar for Jeremy Smith

Jeremy Smith

Moving Image and Audio Archivist, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Manage the Open Education program at UMass Amherst.

Thursday May 7, 2020 12:00pm - 1:00pm EDT
Zoom2

12:00pm EDT

Peer Review Party: Your Invitation to Equitable, Inclusive, & Thoughtful Peer Review

Peer review is an important component of scholarly discourse, adding a level of quality assurance and accountability to publications. However, it can also be an intimidating process to participate in for both new reviewers and peer review coordinators. This workshop aims to demystify the review process, helping both those participating and coordinating the process undertake future endeavors with confidence. Drawing on our experiences as the editorial team for the Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, we will review the process, explore different types of peer review (blind, double-blind, open), share the components of what makes a quality peer review, and provide tips to send reviewers when they agree to evaluate manuscripts.

We will also share the perspective of an editor, discussing how to evaluate submitted reviews and identify reviewers, with an eye towards recruiting inclusively. Identifying reviewers from various locales and experiences and removing barriers to participation has a positive and generative impact on the manuscripts selected for and published by journals. Doing so not only incorporates fuller, more representative perspectives but also hopefully leads to an increase in submissions authored by diverse community members. Thus, we foreground this workshop with understanding that the scholarly communications community needs a far more diverse pool of reviewers in order to become equitable and inclusive.

Workshop participants will be prepared to undertake peer review on their own and guide editors from their local publishing programs in developing or enhancing their peer review process. Although this session will focus on journals, as is reflective of our experiences, we aim to make the takeaways easily applicable to other forms of publication. We will also provide guidance and resources for those who wish to replicate the workshop at their own institution.

View the Peer Review Toolkit

Speakers
avatar for Lynnee Argabright

Lynnee Argabright

Open Access Research Assistant, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
avatar for Jessica Kirschner

Jessica Kirschner

Open Educational Resources Librarian, Virginia Commonwealth University
RK

Rebekah Kati

Institutional Repository Librarian, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
AG

Anne Gilliland

Scholarly Communications Officer, University of North Carolina


Thursday May 7, 2020 12:00pm - 1:00pm EDT
Zoom1

1:00pm EDT

Break
Thursday May 7, 2020 1:00pm - 1:15pm EDT
TBA

1:15pm EDT

Making Digital Monographs: Rethinking Relationships and Collaborative Models
Over the past decade, the scholarly community has created a remarkable, and often overwhelming, array of digital tools, publishing platforms, and models for open access funding and distribution. Humanities and social sciences scholars are increasingly eager to take advantage of these developments to explore new digital expressions, and potentially new audiences, for their monographs.

But the production of digital monographs presents a unique challenge, as workflows, peer review standards, and even basic vocabulary are just beginning to evolve. Moreover, authors often require new kinds of support from their home institutions, particularly through libraries and digital scholarship centers, to realize their project visions.

This session brings together authors, digital scholarship professionals, and academic press professionals to share their stories of collaboration in publishing digital monographs of all stripes—from enhanced open access editions of conventional print books to born-digital interactive scholarly works. How did these works come into being? Why were the authors committed to digital publication? What support did their home institutions provide? When and how did publishers enter the picture? What challenges emerged during the editorial and production processes, and how were they resolved? How can we encourage a shared vocabulary for these digital publications among the wider scholarly communications community?

The session focuses less on demonstrating the case studies themselves and more on the ways in which various stakeholders collaborated to fully realize the project/author’s vision. Audience members will be invited to share their own stories, including challenges and questions arising with their own digital publications or works in progress. Session format: speaker presentations for 60 minutes, including Q&A.

Speakers
CB

Crystal Brusch

Designer for Online Publications, Brown University
TL

Tom Lee

Greenhouse Studios Design Technologist, University of Connecticut
avatar for Tara Nummedal (she/her)

Tara Nummedal (she/her)

Professor of History and Italian Studies, Brown University
Early modern European history, history of science, alchemy, scholarly digital publishing
NZ

Nadine Zimmerli

Editor for History and Social Sciences, University of Virginia Press
KS

Kylie Smith

Associate Professor. Director Center for Healthcare History and Policy, Emory University
SS

Sara Sikes

Associate Director, Greenhouse Studios at UConn
SM

Sarah McKee

Senior Associate Director for Publishing, Fox Center for Humanistic Inquiry, Emory University
avatar for Allison Levy

Allison Levy

Director, Brown University Digital Publications, Brown University Library
Allison Levy is Director of Brown University Digital Publications, a Mellon Foundation- and NEH-supported collaboration between the University Library and the Dean of the Faculty. In this role, she brings together key organizational, academic, and technological resources across the... Read More →


Thursday May 7, 2020 1:15pm - 2:15pm EDT
Zoom2

1:15pm EDT

Building a Foundation for Sustainable Library Publishing: Quantitative Tools & Practical Methods
As library publishing programs continue to expand, developing a sustainable framework for onboarding journals and publishing new content has become imperative. In 2019 the Indiana University Libraries open access publishing program reached over 50 journals. To cope with this workload, we recognized the need to develop a methodology for sustainable publishing. Up to that point, we onboarded new journals as soon as the editors were ready, and went to great lengths to accommodate new feature requests and technical changes. Meanwhile, library employees were spending a disproportionate amount of time on publishing maintenance and routine, repetitive editorial queries.
To alleviate these issues, we developed a quantitative assessment for our journals that assigned points correlating to the number of work hours a given task took to complete. We then assessed all existing journals and decided on the amount of FTE workforce we could dedicate to journal publishing. This allowed us to calculate the number of points that could be added each quarter, and establish a queue system - any journals projected to exceed this amount would be onboarded in a future quarter. We also created new FAQs addressing common user issues. The strain on our department immediately lessened, and we have already seen a more consistent and sustainable workflow. This system also allowed us to set stable timelines to process requests, and focus on doing more collaborative work with editors rather than automatically completing tasks for them.
This session will present a case study of the Indiana University Libraries Scholarly Communication department’s quantitative methods for onboarding and maintaining journals. Participants will have the opportunity to apply our methodology to their own programs, and brainstorm how to develop methodologies that would fit with their own needs and resources. We will also provide time to discuss long-term projections for library publishing programs.
Resources
Activity 
Feedback 

Speakers
avatar for Willa Camille Liburd

Willa Camille Liburd

Research Impact and Open Scholarship Librarian, IU BLOOMINGTON
Hi! In my work I manage open scholarship resources at IU Bloomington Libraries and provide publication data and data analysis to library administration, as well as colleges and departments, for institutional decision-making. I am committed to advancing inclusion and belonging in my... Read More →
JH

Jenny Hoops

Open Access Publishing Manager, Indiana University Libraries



Thursday May 7, 2020 1:15pm - 2:15pm EDT
Zoom1

2:15pm EDT

Break
Thursday May 7, 2020 2:15pm - 2:45pm EDT
TBA

2:45pm EDT

Build Better Infrastructure with Machine-Readable Data: All Your Book Are Belong to Us: How Computational Research Access is Getting Lost in Translation
Human readers are already in the minority, as bot and computer readership now and increasingly comprises the norm. Yet, most scholarly and library publishers either ignore this large potential audience or even actively prevent these readers from accessing content, thus hindering computationally-informed research and hobbling the growth of scholarship and human knowledge. As a longtime advocate and successful negotiator of access to proprietary content for data mining and other computational research, Darby Orcutt has for many years been in the trenches and C-suites of academic and non-academic publishers, and here shares his knowledge of the fears, misunderstandings, and burgeoning solutions for enabling appropriate and robust data access. In a networked world, connection creates value, and the value and future relevance of scholarly publishing depends on connection with computer readers.

Speakers
avatar for Darby Orcutt

Darby Orcutt

Assistant Head, Collections & Research Strategy, NC State University Libraries
I am a librarian, teacher, researcher, and leader deeply interested and involved in interdisciplinary and computational research, the future of higher ed, and cultural aspects of digital transformation.Assistant Head, Collections & Research Strategy, NC State University LibrariesFaculty... Read More →


Thursday May 7, 2020 2:45pm - 3:45pm EDT
Zoom2

2:45pm EDT

Build Better Infrastructure with Machine-Readable Data: Building connections in Crossref metadata records
Scholarly infrastructure consists of connections between researchers, research data, funders, research outputs, and more. These links are sometimes unseen but make the whole system work, and need to evolve just as research and discovery evolves. The strongest links are persistent identifiers but only if they are maintained, curated and adopted. Most of you are familiar with Crossref DOIs, and understand how they help identify and link persistently - Crossref also enables machine readable connections through our metadata records This session will explore how metadata and identifiers combine in Crossref metadata records to unite researchers, publishers, funders, and libraries. We’ll cover data citation, the challenges of identifying open access materials, new PID-powered initiatives like Grant IDs and Conference IDs, and more.

Speakers
avatar for Patricia Feeney

Patricia Feeney

Head of Metadata, Crossref


Thursday May 7, 2020 2:45pm - 3:45pm EDT
Zoom2

2:45pm EDT

OER and Open Access Textbooks Review Standards and Approval Rubric
During this session attendees will compare and discover review standards for open educational resources (OER) and open access textbooks. Attendees will curate these standards into best practices for North America. If gaps in the review standards are identified, attendees will identify these and be given an opportunity to create or recommend standards be created in these areas. Building on this knowledge of review standards, attendees will review or develop an approval rubric for OER and open access textbooks. These review standards and approval rubric will guide library publisher as they develop and publish OER and open access textbooks. Attendees will be invited to develop resources created during this session for publication. Please note that contributions by attendees/authors will be creative commons licensed.

Speakers
RC

Rebel Cummings-Sauls

Director, FLVC


Thursday May 7, 2020 2:45pm - 3:45pm EDT
Zoom1

3:45pm EDT

Break
Thursday May 7, 2020 3:45pm - 4:00pm EDT
TBA

4:00pm EDT

To Have or Not to Have? Open Discussion about Library Publishing Advisory Boards

Some library publishing operations make use of a Publications Advisory Board to oversee the process, provide insight and input, and to approve publication proposals submitted to the program. We will share different perspectives on Advisory Boards and their roles in library publishing programs, culminating in a shared document for the use of library publishing programs that have, or are considering the creation of, a Publications Advisory Board. Topics discussed will include the general mission and activities of the Board, the composition of a Board, how to facilitate engagement with Board members, and the benefits and drawbacks of having a Publications Advisory Board. Audience input will be gathered regarding the document, and particularly sought from audience members who have been considering implementing a Publications Advisory Board, or who have decided not to pursue a Board.

Speakers
avatar for Lauren B. Collister

Lauren B. Collister

Director, Office of Scholarly Communication, University of Pittsburgh
Director of the Office of Scholarly Communication and Publishing at the University Library System at the University of Pittsburgh. Also a sociolinguist, OpenCon alumna. Specialist in language and linguistics data, including citation, reproducibility, intellectual property, and archiving/sharing... Read More →
avatar for Christine Fruin

Christine Fruin

Scholarly Communication & Digital Initiatives Manager, Atla
Christine Fruin is the Atla Scholarly Communication and Digital Initiatives Manager. As an attorney and a librarian, she has worked for nearly 15 years promoting access to and use of diverse collections and scholarship through utilization of fair use, open access, and responsible... Read More →
avatar for Ally Laird

Ally Laird

Open Publishing Program Coordinator, Penn State University Libraries


Thursday May 7, 2020 4:00pm - 5:00pm EDT
Zoom1
 
Friday, May 8
 

12:00pm EDT

Sharing, Learning, and Supporting Across Institutions: Experiences from the Pilot Year of the LPC Mentorship Program
While mentoring is common within librarianship, the structure of mentoring programs varies widely. Mentor/mentee relationships may be casual or formal; participants may or may not belong to the same institution or follow similar career paths; the goal may be career-focused or may be to foster a sense of support and belonging. Whatever the structure of a mentoring program, establishing and communicating grounded expectations determine the success of the relationship.

In 2019, the Professional Development Committee of the Library Publishing Coalition launched its pilot Mentorship Program. The Program aims to orient mentees to the LPC and enrich mentors’ experiences with the LPC, building relationships between the two, and to further the development of library publishing through a professional, semi-structured mentorship program. Mentors and mentees were paired up in late February 2019 and provided with suggestions and guidelines on meeting throughout the year.

In this presentation, two pairs of mentors/mentees from the LPC Mentorship Program will discuss shared and separate experiences with establishing a trusted and productive mentoring relationship.We will also recommend strategies for successful mentoring, such as discussing preferred outcomes/goals and being upfront about limitations. There will be ample time for audience questions, and other LPC mentor/mentee pairs are encouraged to attend and share their experiences during this time. Through our session, we hope to host an open conversation that encourages attendees to examine their connections to mentoring, growing a stronger practice within the LPC community.

Presentation materials - including slides and resources from the LPC Mentorship Program - are available for download from https://bit.ly/LPCmentoring.

Speakers
avatar for Ian Harmon

Ian Harmon

Scholarly Communications Librarian, West Virginia University Libraries
avatar for Chelsea Johnston

Chelsea Johnston

Scholarly Publishing & Repository Librarian, University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries
avatar for Jody Bailey

Jody Bailey

Head of Scholarly Communications Office, Emory University Libraries
avatar for Ally Laird

Ally Laird

Open Publishing Program Coordinator, Penn State University Libraries
avatar for Sarah Wipperman

Sarah Wipperman

Scholarly Communications Librarian, Villanova University



Friday May 8, 2020 12:00pm - 1:00pm EDT
Zoom1

1:00pm EDT

Break
Friday May 8, 2020 1:00pm - 1:15pm EDT
TBA

1:15pm EDT

The Medium Matters: Publishing Innovations: From University Press to eScholarship Publishing: Differences and Similarities
I recently assumed the role of Publications Manager for eScholarship Publishing at the California Digital Library following a long career in nonprofit scholarly publishing, primarily at the University of California Press’s Journals Division. This transition has afforded me a somewhat unique perspective on both of these publishing domains -- and I am particularly interested in the ways in which library publishers might both adopt publishing best practices from their press colleagues and maintain the distinct stance from which they serve a different purpose within the institution.

Moving to an OA library publishing program has eliminated many of the complexities posed by subscriptions, sales, and library purchasing budgets, but I now face a different set of challenges in dealing with publications that have neither the carrot of funding nor the stick of contractual obligations to my organization. Despite these differences, both non-profit and OA library publishers must answer the same fundamental question: how to build and sustain a journals program that offers a compelling alternative to and sometimes even competes with commercial publishers, while operating with significantly fewer resources. I believe there are important opportunities to leverage the knowledge from each distinct professional domain and enhance both.

This presentation will examine the differences and similarities between non-profit and OA library publishing and offer thoughts on some quick wins for increasing discoverability, driving submissions, and growing usage and citations of OA journal publications -- from the perspective of a newcomer to the community. It will also, hopefully, provide a forum for library publishers of all sizes to share their thoughts and concerns about their own programs, giving us all a space to learn from each other and develop new strategies and tactics for our publishing endeavours.

Speakers
avatar for rachel lee

rachel lee

Publications Manager, eScholarship Publishing


Friday May 8, 2020 1:15pm - 2:15pm EDT
Zoom2

1:15pm EDT

The Medium Matters: Publishing Innovations: Pieces of Publications: Exploring New Ideas for Sharing Digital Projects
Large-scale digital projects can take years to complete and include many moving pieces. However, oftentimes the final web-based product is the only thing shared and it may not fully showcase the effort put into the project. Additionally, these projects often lack a sustainability and maintenance plans and can go offline after only a few years due to technical issues which effectively eliminates all signs of years of hard work. In the world of publishing, this is a huge contrast to more traditionally publications such as a book or journal that can live on for decades.

In this presentation, I will propose that while we support and publish large-scale digital projects we should expand our view of the project being the final website and consider ancillary materials as part of the publication itself. These materials can include but are not limited to research data, images, audio recordings, documentation, grant proposals, and white papers. These different pieces can form together to create a portfolio or exhibit that can build up over time as the project grows so the work can continue to be used and cited in its various formats. Additionally, by publishing the work together and linking the various pieces to each other, this would also increase the findability of the different pieces and promote open access by allowing other researchers to easily adapt key pieces of the research like the data.

Speakers
CG

Corinne Guimont

Digital Scholarship Coordinator, Virginia Tech


Friday May 8, 2020 1:15pm - 2:15pm EDT
Zoom2

1:15pm EDT

The Medium Matters: Publishing Innovations: Print Pathways in OER Publishing
The State University of New York (SUNY) OER Services team (SOS) has been assisting faculty within the SUNY system in publishing print OER textbooks since Fall 2017 and is excited to share its experiences with others who are interested in pursuing print pathways at their own institutions. As of Fall 2019, SOS has published over 60 print OER textbooks ranging from various open platforms’ unedited OER content, to faculty-edited content, to faculty-created content. SOS will share its experience in working with faculty toward print options, print-ready PDF creation, print-on-demand vendor selection and workflows, developing campus bookstore relationships and partnerships, and creating affordable textbook pricing models.

Speakers
avatar for Amanda Wentworth

Amanda Wentworth

OER Publishing Coordinator, SUNY Geneseo


Friday May 8, 2020 1:15pm - 2:15pm EDT
Zoom2

2:15pm EDT

Break
Friday May 8, 2020 2:15pm - 2:45pm EDT
TBA

2:45pm EDT

XML Publishing Workflows: Tools, Practices, and the Future
Publishers, hosting institutions and upstream services are increasingly investing in XML as part of the scholarly publishing process, and new tools are being developed to reduce both the cost and complexity of publishing in XML. Public Knowledge Project (PKP) has been incredibly active in this space, and is working with other leading community members to establish the best standards and tools for editors, authors and readers. We are very happy to now be able to present the tools available today, and present our plans for the future.

Included in this presentation will be a demonstration of our Texture JATS editor integration in OJS; a demo of some of the JATS publishing and display tools we have been working on; and an update on our work in the Word->XML conversion space (focusing on Grobid in particular). We will also discuss our current development roadmap, including a review of the gaps in the workflow we have already identified, and then invite discussion on any aspect of this publishing workflow and associated set of tools. Finally, we will provide a test environment for session participants to use at their leisure after the presentation, and will be available for follow-up questions.

Speakers
avatar for James MacGregor

James MacGregor

Managing Director (Interim), Public Knowledge Project
James MacGregor is currently the interim Managing Director of the Public Knowledge Project (PKP). He has been working with PKP since 2007, and has dabbled in documentation writing, development, support, and outreach over the years. James coordinated the development of PKP's Publishing... Read More →


Friday May 8, 2020 2:45pm - 3:45pm EDT
Zoom2

2:45pm EDT

Library Publishing Curriculum: Users, Uses, & Updates

The Library Publishing Curriculum is a suite of synchronous and asynchronous professional development offerings for librarians that are open and free under a CC-BY license for anyone to offer or adapt. This dynamic, extensible, multimedia curriculum empowers librarians to meet local demands to launch or enhance scholarly publishing activities. Released in 2018, the initial curriculum includes four modules that address major competencies in library publishing: Content, Impact, Policy, and Sustainability.

Recent and ongoing efforts to manage and update the curriculum include providing leadership for the curriculum, revising and enhancing the existing modules to include more and different types of engagements and interactions, and providing a more stable and sustainable technological base for its ongoing success. This work will continue for the next few years, and the curriculum leadership team seeks input during this experimental focus group session from current and potential users of the curriculum—anyone in the library publishing community who has ideas and/or feedback for how to present and create more/different/better ways of communicating and engaging users with the curriculum.

During the session, presenters will provide a brief overview of the curriculum offerings, update attendees on any changes that have occurred with the curriculum since its initial IMLS-funded grant reporting period ended, and discuss the editorial board configuration that is to be enacted during Summer 2020. In addition, a significant amount of the experimental session time will be spent asking participants to engage in a hands-on brainstorming/revision-suggestion period that can provide additional ideas for the editorial board to consider, in terms of new modules, translations, user engagements and usability on the new platform, etc.

Speakers
avatar for Cheryl E. Ball

Cheryl E. Ball

Executive Director, Council of Editors of Learned Journals
Talk to me about Kairos, the longest continuously running scholarly multimedia journal; the Council of Editors of Learned Journals; or what digital projects you are currently working on!
avatar for Kaycee White

Kaycee White

Digital Publishing Intern, Wayne State Universty


Friday May 8, 2020 2:45pm - 3:45pm EDT
Zoom1

3:45pm EDT

Break
Friday May 8, 2020 3:45pm - 4:00pm EDT
TBA

4:00pm EDT

Career Development Lab: Professional Development and Transferable Skills in Scholarly Publishing
This career development lab provides discussion, strategies to employ, and possible answers to the following questions: What are the key skills needed for successful careers in library publishing in the next ten years? Has scholarly and academic publishing shifted from a ‘trade’—an apprenticeship, learned mostly on the job—to a ‘profession’—learning and applying a body of relevant skills and best-practices? What is the value of a masters in publishing, masters in library and information science, MBA, or other graduate degree? How can diverse voices and perspectives best be integrated seamlessly into the fabric of library and academic publishing, and what can individuals in the profession do to welcome these new voices? We will engage participants in some of these questions in an interactive format, and will actively seek input and comments from participants. This event welcomes both early career professionals and those further on in their publishing career.

Speakers
avatar for Laurie Taylor

Laurie Taylor

Senior Director for Library Technology & Digital Strategies, University of Florida
avatar for Elizabeth Scarpelli

Elizabeth Scarpelli

Director, University of Cincinnati Press
Here's what's different about us.1. We are a new university press and library publisher. Est. 20172. We are outnumbered 3 to 1 with student employees and we love it!3. Our mission is to provide quality, peer review publishing that aligns and supports the university's strategic directives4... Read More →
HN

Hanni Nabahe

Research Librarian, OER Specialist, University of Virginia Library
avatar for John W. Warren

John W. Warren

Director and Associate Professor, George Washington University
As Director / Associate Professor, Graduate Program in Publishing program at The George Washington University, I help prepare diverse professionals for leadership careers in publishing. Formerly, I held the positions of Director, George Mason University Press; Marketing and Sales... Read More →


Friday May 8, 2020 4:00pm - 5:00pm EDT
Zoom1
 


Twitter Feed

Filter sessions
Apply filters to sessions.